The Diwali blockbuster “Amaran”, starring Sivakarthikeyan, has stirred conversations on social media, with some netizens questioning why the movie, based mostly on the lifetime of Tamil Naduâs adorned military hero Main Mukund Varadarajan, omits any reference to his caste id. Director Rajkumar Periyasamy not too long ago responded to the discussions, explaining this narrative selection.
“Amaran”, which has reportedly grossed over â¹100 crore worldwide in its opening weekend, is impressed by Main Mukund Varadarajanâs life and sacrifice. Though Varadarajan belonged to the Brahmin neighborhood, his caste id was not highlighted within the movie. This choice has sparked on-line debates, harking back to the controversy surrounding “Soorarai Pottru” for the same motive.
Addressing these queries throughout the “Amaran” success occasion, Rajkumar Periyasamy shared perception into the strategy, stating, âMukundâs spouse, Indhu, had a transparent imaginative and prescient for the way he must be represented. She requested that Mukund be recognized as a Tamilian, and emphasised that his legacy as an Indian soldier and Tamilian was all that mattered. In each sense, Mukund noticed himself as an Indian first, and we revered that within the movie.â
Periyasamy continued, âAmaran is a tribute to Main Mukund Varadarajanâs bravery and selfless service to the nation, past any caste id. Honoring his life and the distinguished Ashok Chakra he earned, the movie celebrates his heroism, reflecting the soldier he was, freed from labels and divisions.â The director’s rationalization is at the moment doing rounds on social media.
#Sivakarthikeyans #Amaran #reveal #Mukund #Varadarajans #communal #id #Director #solutions #Tamil #Information
#Sivakarthikeyans #Amaran #reveal #Mukund #Varadarajans #communal #id #Director #solutions #Tamil #Information
why-sivakarthikeyans-amaran-did-not-reveal-mukund-varadarajans-communal-identity-director-answers-tamil-news